For a while now, I’ve been involved in Kuramoto models and adjusting them to data. Recently I’ve stumbled upon using Bayesian inference on predicting parameters in time-evolving dynamics. Team from Physics Department at University of Lancaster has produced many papers, but to provide with some reference it might be worth to look at .
Technique refers to general phase dynamics in oscillator, i.e.
where and are intrinsic frequency, self coupling and coupling with other oscillators, respectively. Term refers to noise and although authors claim that it can be any type of noise calculations are performed for white Gaussian type. I don’t really want to go much into details, because on first sight it might look complicated. Just to point out few steps that are necessary to introduce my examples:
- Rewrite model in form of , where is parameters vector, provides significant terms (for example via Fourier decomposition) for our model and is a vector of all oscillators’ phases (at some moment).
- Calculate diagonal values of Jacobian matrix, i.e. .
- Set a priori probabilities for parameters vector and its covariance (or concentration ).
Then the problem is reduced to finding maximum of minus log-likelihood function S. Authors also provide the exact formulas and algorithm, which find the extremum. Tutorial on applying their algorithm can be found in .
Based on MatLab code provided be the authors, and available on their webpage , I have written my own program in Python (code available in Code section or here ). As an experiment I have used simple Kuramoto model with sinusoidal coupling between phases
which means there are 12 parameters – three intrinsic frequencies () and 3×3 K matrix representing coupling between pairs of oscillators. To each oscillator small Gaussian noise was added (mean 0 and standard deviation 0.01). Signals were generated for with sampling step . Furthermore, analysis was performed on 8 s segments with 2 s step. Figure 1 shows instantaneous frequencies () for each oscillator. Figure 2 presents calculated parameters for each segment (thus time dependency). To be honest, I am quite surprised how good this technique works. I have performed more experiments, but to keep it short I am posting just one. There are some fluctuations in obtained values, but those changes are very small and most likely, in practical sense, negligible.
 A. Duggento, T. Stankovski, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, “Dynamical Bayesian inference of time-evolving interactions: From a pair of coupled oscillators to networks of oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E – Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2012.
 T. Stankovski, A. Duggento, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, “A tutorial on time-evolving dynamical Bayesian inference,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., vol. 223, no. 13, pp. 2685–2703, 2014.
 Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, Lancaster University http://py-biomedical.lancaster.ac.uk/.